As the Australian Minister for Immigration and Citizenship, Chris Bowen, visits East Timor this week, with hopes of negotiating an offshore processing centre on the Pacific island, he is well aware of the mounting opposition to his government’s immigration policies.
Discussions about the establishment of a new offshore processing centre and overcrowded domestic detention facilities have saturated the media and have infiltrated question time in both the House of Representatives and the Senate since parliament returned in September. Quite rightly so, I might add.
The Australian people are angry that the Gillard government is failing to manage the rising levels of asylum seekers inhabiting domestic detention centres.
As a temporary solution to the situation, Minister Chris Bowen announced on September 17 he would be expanding the Curtin detention centre and adapting the Scherper Airforce Base to meet the growing demands for detention accommodation.
But I can’t help noticing the feeling of déjà vu that hits me as I follow the debate on asylum seekers.
Without too much exaggeration it could be said that our immigration policy has reverted back a decade to a time near the 2001 election (think John Howard and the hysteria that went with the Tampa Crisis).
As the Australian government formulates its proposal for an offshore processing centre in East Timor, now is the time for education about Australia’s responsibilities to asylum seekers, as outlined by the Refugee Convention to which we are a signatory.
The Australian public must understand that under international law, asylum seekers cannot be sent to a third country for processing.
The proposal – as it currently stands - by the Australian government for an East Timorese offshore processing centre is illegal.
The proposal contravenes Article 31 of the Refugee Convention.
According to Article 31, “refugees have the right to seek and enjoy asylum from persecution in another country without having their entry prevented and without being penalised.”
The view of Amnesty International is one with which I sympathise wholeheartedly; “as one of the few countries in the Asia Pacific region to have signed the Refugee Convention, Australia should be leading by example and providing a positive example of how best to protect refugees.”
As Aussies, we like to think of ourselves as a friendly, multicultural and tolerant bunch. We pride ourselves above all on giving everyone a “fair go”.
It should follow, then, that our government’s foreign policies reflect those intrinsic values.
Our nation has a responsibility to refugees.
With increasing levels of Sri Lankan and Afghan asylum seekers making their way to Australia’s shores, our country needs to ensure it is prepared to process asylum seekers efficiently.
In the last 10 months over 4,000 people have been placed in immigration detention; there are now approximately 4,699 people in detention.
According to the Australian Department of Immigration, more than 70 new refugees are entering detention centres each week.
And although the Labor government promised to limit the time spent in detention to less than ninety days, 65 per cent of detainees are currently kept in processing centre for over three months.
The Australian government’s decision to lift the freeze on the processing of Sri Lankan claims in July 2010, and most recently for Afghani refugees on October 1st, 2010, has been warmly welcomed by some human rights groups and opposition political parties.
The Australian Human Rights Commission published a statement welcoming the action as a “positive step in the treatment of asylum seekers in Australia”.
Amnesty International, however, was quick to point out that “the current issues we are seeing in Australia’s detention facilities are problems of the government’s own making, and the results of short-sighted and ill-considered moves such as this policy”.
I urge the Australian government to look towards a regional framework within the Asia-Pacific region, rather than replicating the failed policies of the Howard government, under its ‘Pacific Solution’.
Now is the time for the Gillard government to step up, and to meet its commitments under the Refugee Convention.
The Australian people should not and must not tolerate our government passing on its responsibilities to smaller, less-equipped regional counterparts, such as East Timor.
Image: http://www.google.com.au/imgres?imgurl=http://www.abc.net.au/reslib/200812/r321482_1433497.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/12/09/2441028.htm&usg=__VEybhYg--1HhIzvKrD3h5JdRAbk=&h=630&w=840&sz=97&hl=en&start=0&zoom=1&tbnid=aTnDYUtxMTnREM:&tbnh=144&tbnw=179&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dasylum%2Bseekers%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26client%3Dsafari%26sa%3DN%26rls%3Den%26biw%3D1267%26bih%3D626%26tbs%3Disch:10%2C342&um=1&itbs=1&iact=hc&vpx=329&vpy=91&dur=116&hovh=194&hovw=259&tx=94&ty=112&ei=vsW2TIfXCMOycPvJmaYJ&oei=vsW2TIfXCMOycPvJmaYJ&esq=1&page=1&ndsp=18&ved=1t:429,r:13,s:0&biw=1267&bih=626
533020-news-detainee-riot-20100829.jpg